Monday, October 12, 2009

Meghan McCain Continues to Impress, President Obama Continues to Disappoint















Fresh off his Nobel Peace Prize announcement, President Obama addressed thousands of gay right protestors marching at our nation’s capital this past Saturday night. It was a rousing speech, as always, filled with promises and strong, assertive language.

But it was an empty speech, void of action, conviction, or credibility. He promised to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” the controversial Clinton-era policy of identity suppression in the military. But it was a promise he’d made before. And it was a promise he has thus far utterly failed to act upon.

As Andrew Sullivan writes:

All I can say is: the president gave a speech he could have given at any point in the last three years. No one in that room could disagree with any of the things he said. I sure don't (with the exception of the hate crimes hooey). And he said it well and movingly. Like we didn't know he could do that.


But the point of electing a president who pledged to actually do things is to hold him to account, and to see if he is willing to take any risk of any kind to actually do something. I had a few prior tests of his seriousness or signs that he gets it, a few ways to judge if this speech had anything new or specific or clear. He failed every test.

Meghan McCain, equally appalled, writes:

Obama offered no timeline for phasing out this policy and, as usual, no real specifics. But the president verbalized his commitment to ending it—which is not insignificant [...]During the election, Obama pledged that the very first thing he would do as president would be to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell. Although I thought it was an ambitious promise, I believed him. It's now almost a year into his presidency and other than making speeches, nothing has happened.

There’s no two ways around it: Sullivan and McCain are spot on. This administration has thus far been absolutely abysmal in promoting social equality. Abysmal. Crumbling economy notwithstanding, don’t get on a pulpit and expect us to be happy with negligence. Don’t say all the right things and expect us to be satisfied with gross inaction. Don’t try to appease the progressive electorate that struggled to put you in office. Don’t make empty promises you have no intention of honoring.

It’s a sad state of affairs when the daughter of Obama’s Republican challenger from last November has a better stance on gay rights than our own Democratic President. If the Nobel Peace Price was intended to push Obama to, you know, actually promote peace by ending our two wars, what award do we need to give him to promote gay rights? What will it take, and how much longer must we wait?

As Meghan McCain continues to assert herself at the forefront of the fight for gay rights, Obama continues to disappoint. Maybe he thinks repealing "Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell" is unwise politically, regardless of his personal beliefs. Maybe he thinks a gay rights agenda will hurt him in the future. This may be so, but his insulting failure to act—on the eve of National Coming Out Day, no less—certainly isn’t winning him any new progressive allies.

Obama has the potential to promote real, substantive change. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like he'll be acting on that potential any time soon.

7 comments:

  1. I think there is a reason it's being hung up. likely political and likely to do with getting other bills passed (like the health care???) That said, it's easy for McCain Jr. to piss on him when she is not in his place. If McCain or his daughter were in office there would be huge opposition. At what expense are we will to repeal don't ask don't tell? Maybe he needs to be more open about the opposition.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It’s a sad state of affairs when the daughter of Obama’s Republican challenger from last November has a better stance on gay rights than our own Democratic President.

    Come on, this isn't fair. If the roles were reversed and Meghan McCain were President and Obama was a little-known blogger trying to get his name into the mainstream, I'm pretty confident the situation would be very much the same. You can't compare someone trying to play the politics game with someone writing like she has nothing to lose.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Point taken; I'm obviously doing an apples to oranges comparison of a wannabe political pundit and the President--basically comparing someone that merely writes about politics with someone that *is* politics.

    That said, I don't really care. I know that sounds naive, and a bit oblivious to the political process. And I know Obama has bigger fish to fry (healthcare), BUT that shouldn't really stop him from a Friday afternoon executive decree repealing DADT. It's largely a symbolic measure, but hell if it wouldn't be powerful.

    I honestly have little patience for the idea that he should take his time, or that he's been doing a sufficient job, politically, in the struggle for gay rights. If he says he believes in these things, then do something about it. He mentions "our gay brothers and sisters" in his speech to the NAACP, but the repeated acknowledgment of their plight isn't the same as an actual policy shift. We really shouldn't be in a situation in which a Republican--even if she's writing from the sheltered comfort of her penthouse apartment--can call out our President for not being socially liberal enough. The apologetic interpretation of his inaction has begun to wear thin on me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No, no, no! Who cares if a republican is calling him out. It's obvious that political games are going on and I'm willing to bet that since the DEM(wit)Blue congress can't agree on a health care bill, SOMEONE (Blue and Red) is using the don't ask don't tell policy as ammo. "If you repeal it, I won't support this, that or the third." And now you have some kind of stalemate. The problem (if such is the case) is that Obama refuses to play that way and reveal who is holding up what. There are probably a lot more Dems than we realize that are on the fence or not supporting the repealing of that act. I think if there were more democrats to null a filibuster then you could just do it and damn the outcome. I don't know about you, but I'd rather have the health care reform go through than a repeal on don't ask at the moment. The perfect example is Arlen Spector's role in the Free Choice Act (unions and such). He went Blue but changed his stance and now that bill's passage was slowed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ah, so that explains it all. Just some politicians leveraging the President, (theoretically? potentially?) threatening to stall healthcare reform if Obama pushes ahead and repeals DADT. That must be why we are still fighting two wars overseas, too. And why Obama's lofty transportation bill is all but removed from national priority altogether (http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/09/08/2009-was-supposed-to-be-an-exciting-year-in-transportation-what-happened/).

    Promises included, and continue to include, a massive overhaul of transportation policy (with an impressive interagency planning committee to boot), an end to our failed wars, and basic human rights for our nation's gay citizens. But if we want healthcare reform, we better just shut up and forget about all of that.

    That may be how the political process works, sure. It may be how bills are passed, and initiatives go through the Senate. But that doesn't make me any less upset with empty promises.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I completely disagree. He can't possibly ask Congress to vote on all these bills at once. And for those who act as though he hasn't been doing anything for the past 9 months - he actually has, they must not be paying attention.

    Executive orders are a quick way to piss off moderates and those who respect our legislative process. If we want it to stick (and not be reinstated at a later date) then it must be done the right way — by Congress and when they have time to pass it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. None of us knows what really is going on. I'm just speculating. But We have to give him the benefit of the doubt. He hasn't been in office a year and you expect him to cash in on all of these promises now. I don't think so. It take more than a president to pass a bill. Does he have the support he needs is the big question. And with that said, I'm willing to bet a dollar to a donut that people are playing with that. Why not start calling on Congress to get in line? I agree with John's post. Makes sense to get it right so it won't be re-instated.

    ReplyDelete